UCC Filing cont'dwww.worldnewsstand.net/law/ucc.htm
Registration, Legal Title and Ownership
When you, as the owner of a thing, registered it with the United
States or one of its subdivisions, you let the United States hold the legal title to your thing based on
misrepresentation and failure to disclose material facts to you at the time of registration. You probably
retained possession of the thing. The United States invested the title and made a profit.
If you did not specifically authorize the United States and its
agents to invest the legal title, the profits made from that title belong to you, because as the owner, you
remain the equitable title holder. Legally all the profits from the investment of the titles to all your
registered things must go into a fund for your benefit. If they did not put the profits in a trust fund of
some sort, it would be fraud.
Just acquiring the titles through what is promoted as mandatory
registration, is fraud. If the scenario attributed to Mandell House is now in full application in the United
States, which it is, the officers of the United States could be charged and convicted with treason IF they
had not provided a remedy, which they did. -- House Joint Resolution 192 on June 5, 1933.
This is their insurance policy to assure they are not convicted
of treason. That does not mean they cannot becharged with treason, but the courts will dismiss based on
failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Because you have a remedy outside the court, you
cannot sustain a charge of treason.
The problem in the past with trying to discharge public debts
with instruments that could not be processed through your bank on the corner, was that those discharge
instruments did not route through the Federal Reserve. It is the bean counter for the national debt. That
debt is first and primarily owed to the people who are the equitable titleholders of all the substance in
If you try to discharge a public debt with your discharge
instrument, and you do not route it through the Federal Reserve, it appears you are receiving a benefit from
the United States without exchanging it for something of value. This is not technically correct because you
have a right to be reimbursed, whether or not you apply it toward the debt the United States owes you. You
are the substance; it is the fiction.
Cont'd Quid Pro