Q: Hey Les I Just have a few questions before I
proceed that I'm a little concerned about. Does
anything I acquire after becoming a secured party have
to be added on to the security agreement at a later
time? If I have family property and investments that
will come to me at a later time that is shared with
siblings and parents, does this also need to be
mentioned in the security agreement?

A: The way I set it up I am able to enter in the
information submitted on the form but the bulk of the
information will be entered by you after the fact. In
the ucc1 filing reference will be made to the security
agreement by its ID#. which means that you can update
and change it anytime without having to update the UCCI
the PPSA or the copyright-notice. It becomes part of
your private papers only to be shown to others if you
ever should need to validate that you have a claim
against the straw-man.

Q: Also I should let you know I am married and I'm
wondering if the property, back accounts and
investments that I share with my wife will affect my
wife in any way once I become a secure party?

A: I would think you would only have claim on the share
that the two straw-man have either agreed to or are
deemed to have by legislation.

Q: After discussing this with my wife, she has also
showed interest in becoming a secure party, and if she
does will this affect anything we own in both our
names?

A: Doesn't change anything other than she now is
claiming her share. The bottom line on all this is what
is not claimed reverts to the government by the
doctrine of neglect. So claim everything that you
produced even your children and your own bodies. Of
course if you believe we are all equal under the
creator you cannot claim your wife as your property nor
she you but as you have custody of your children if
under age claim them. When you get the form all you
have to do is fill in the banks - make a rough or
backup copy.

Q: Sorry for all the questions but it feels like I will
be taking a big step in my life that can affect both me
and my family. Thank-you  M

A: Not a problem M__ just realize everything I say is
only my opinion or my take on it not legal advice. My
position is that as we are all equals, my opinion is
just as valid as yours, my beliefs are just as valid as
yours and vice versa and it would be presumptuous of me
to impose my beliefs on you.

All I can do is come from common sense and what seems
reasonable to me. Coming from this position what ever
you say it is, it is - which gives you a lot of power
'notwithstanding' anyone else's interpretation of what
you mean, as you are and can only be your own
authority. (Quebec wouldn't buy into Trudeau's view of
Canada because of the 'notwithstanding' clause he would
not bow down to a superior authority or agree to give
someone the right of last interpretation and neither
should we.)

The paperwork in this scenario by your actions
documents that fact ( your belief you are not the
strawman )So when you do this 'act' of separating
yourself from the strawman by treating it with the
security agreement as being separate from you, it is
separate from you - that is a big step. The paperwork
is merely documentation but documentation that is
recognizable by government by having it witnessed by
its agents. Now you can act independently of it legally
as documented and use it when it is to your advantage
without the liability associated with it, since you do
not own it and what accrues in its name does not
benefit you if it can be taken away at a moment's
notice. This is why you must lien it since everything
it has was created by you. The only caviate is that you
have to act and behave in a consistent matter that is
congruent with your beliefs and that my friend is the
most difficult part as we have been conditioned for so
long to believe we are the strawman. [ For example if I
were to call you as Mr. C____ I bet you would anwser
- I am teasing but it is embedded very deep into out
psyche.)

Hope that assists you - this is more of an exercise of
mind than anything but so is the legal system as that
is all it is based on in my humble opinion. Understand
that in its full implications and then you understand
how everything else falls into place and act
accordingly in your private affairs - nobody need be
any the wiser unless they transgress and then you need
to take a stand by noticing them once, twice three
times before you take any action against them. That is
the civilized response and that is how the copyright
notice is meant to be used. With the paper work you are
establishing clearly your boundaries and claiming back
what is rightfully yours so others will respect you as
a human being and not some 'thing' which is objectified
as a means to an end.

Forgive me if its a little heavy. Basically as the
creator of everything you believe and make, you are the
boss and no one has any right to take that away from
you - ONLY if that is, you set clear boundaries and are
prepared to 'no'tice them if they transgress or cross
into your clearly defined territory or jurisdiction.
Since they live in a paper world we have to communicate
with paper. The problem in this age of political
correctness is that we just don't know how to say
'no':-)  Cheers!